Ombudsman of the Bill was the long-awaited country he became, in Parliament, but its format is not in it as the country was expected to finish it or fight corruption Bill. rather than partisan politics in the upcoming elections in keeping with the purpose of gaining profit. designed it can be understood by the fact that the Ombudsman bill SCBackward classes, scheduled tribes, minorities and women, as well as the provision of quotas has been the most so that think Government is the institution of the Ombudsman rather than curb corruption, an employment agency in which all the sections, castes and people must be involved dharmo. Government's approach is very unfortunate corruption issue has once again shown in khatai. that is why the Ombudsman Bill format and the Government's intention in the minds of people are beginning to doubt and question stand. these questions the first question that Ombudsman's statutory institution based on minority religions in the purpose of the reservation and justification?Bill Ombudsman's Office being from Hindu-Muslim glasses, while the Constitution was clear that constitutional positions of religion, race, gender, etc. cannot be based on discrimination and if so, it would be unconstitutional, reservations of jobs. educational institutions other than the legislature, the Parliament and Assembly may be applied inWhile the Ombudsman's Office in any category. we must recognize that the Ombudsman institution instead of a constitutional Government, the elections Commissioner, Office of the Chief Justice, Prime Minister etc. understand the true spirit of the Constitution, the Government has proposed in the original Ombudsman bill was not approved of religious reservations, But after some parties and vote Bank, the Government has improved the original proposal in Parliament, it added the provision by the parliamentary history for the first time when. Parliament proposed in its original format changes after placed. If the Supreme Court made in the Ombudsman institution is given the challenge against the likely that the Government rejected it. To know, that's why he's saying the Constitution Amendment, but it would be against the original spirit of the Constitution to a question in the lokayukta. States also impose.
Ombudsman in its current format-lokayukta Bill if passed, it will affect the freedom of States and the federal structure that better injury pahunchegi. so lokayukton's appointment and they return rights issue to be left to the State Governments. Similarly, the CBI's independence and to maintain his impartiality. I also dispute on intelligence and investigation agencies also must be free from government control '' This is because these institutions high posts among the ruling political party accused Ministers and others would see cases against and the work of an institution subject to the Government as long as is not fair to him or the abuse investigation than. that is why the CBI's objectivity and abuse are these questions on why one thing is clear. The CBI to complete partial or in any form should be free from government control and it is also constitutional status of the institution. it is not subject to the Ombudsman and non-government, accountable to Parliament rather than it be made if the CBI is brought to the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman unfettered maybe-even if it is only accountable to Parliament.
Ombudsman under the Prime Minister is too good to be brought to the workings of Government more transparency and fairness in the context badheagi some people argue that the Ombudsman would be a parallel government, because it is being said. Ombudsman be given a lot of powers to the autocratic, but if we give the same Ombudsman infinite powers rather than separate entities create individual Ombudsman so that solutions can be Different judicial Ombudsman has, Parliamentary Ombudsman for the armed forces and different Ombudsman. If so, not only will grow strong parliamentary democracy, accountability and transparency, but also will help curb corruption but also effective. corruption to Ombudsman institution, with the formation of the US system changes would give attention.
Unless the culprit and will then go to the bhrashtachari Parliament, any system or law is much more efficient entity not party political and electoral system instead for us in order to bring changes to its current format initiative. Ombudsman draft is therefore very vulnerable because it does not bhrashtachariyon to deal with the things the corruption. covers why is corruption inWhat are the causes of corruption and what should be the current motion questions like. Bill who will investigate corruption and will refer it to the sentence which, bhrashtachari. to eliminate the root cause of corruption rather than its strong emphasis on the remedial measures, that would cause corruption culture look likely to get him over on effective. overall current Ombudsman
Ombudsman in its current format-lokayukta Bill if passed, it will affect the freedom of States and the federal structure that better injury pahunchegi. so lokayukton's appointment and they return rights issue to be left to the State Governments. Similarly, the CBI's independence and to maintain his impartiality. I also dispute on intelligence and investigation agencies also must be free from government control '' This is because these institutions high posts among the ruling political party accused Ministers and others would see cases against and the work of an institution subject to the Government as long as is not fair to him or the abuse investigation than. that is why the CBI's objectivity and abuse are these questions on why one thing is clear. The CBI to complete partial or in any form should be free from government control and it is also constitutional status of the institution. it is not subject to the Ombudsman and non-government, accountable to Parliament rather than it be made if the CBI is brought to the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman unfettered maybe-even if it is only accountable to Parliament.
Ombudsman under the Prime Minister is too good to be brought to the workings of Government more transparency and fairness in the context badheagi some people argue that the Ombudsman would be a parallel government, because it is being said. Ombudsman be given a lot of powers to the autocratic, but if we give the same Ombudsman infinite powers rather than separate entities create individual Ombudsman so that solutions can be Different judicial Ombudsman has, Parliamentary Ombudsman for the armed forces and different Ombudsman. If so, not only will grow strong parliamentary democracy, accountability and transparency, but also will help curb corruption but also effective. corruption to Ombudsman institution, with the formation of the US system changes would give attention.
Unless the culprit and will then go to the bhrashtachari Parliament, any system or law is much more efficient entity not party political and electoral system instead for us in order to bring changes to its current format initiative. Ombudsman draft is therefore very vulnerable because it does not bhrashtachariyon to deal with the things the corruption. covers why is corruption inWhat are the causes of corruption and what should be the current motion questions like. Bill who will investigate corruption and will refer it to the sentence which, bhrashtachari. to eliminate the root cause of corruption rather than its strong emphasis on the remedial measures, that would cause corruption culture look likely to get him over on effective. overall current Ombudsman
