CBI Truth

Usually the Central Bureau of investigation [CBI] plausible reasons why it not in the Congress Bureau of investigeshan.. coalition Government some of it true friends.

In 1941 the Agency legally formed special police establishment [SPE]. by an order to an April, 1963 was renamed Centre in CBI ruled States SPE act with the Delhi special police establishment the police officers [CBI] powers, duties, rights and uttardayitva about. in addition to the Central Government, ruled the State with the consent of the CBI States check raise any scope of area.

Jvanit under secretary of new CVC Act [j] and above to start investigating the case against the authorities before the Government should allow the prosecution to seek the Government's permission before filing charjashit.

The CBI could set your roadmap for not working because it's like Election Commission, court or constitutional institution kaig. the reality is that the bhrashtachariyon and the priority of any Government is not to punish.

Recently, the Government has told Parliament that in the four years between 2008-2012 j and high-level government officials in the cases against 15 top CBI investigation allowed in case of corruption against them. the CBI wanted to average two years one IAS officer. Government against the decision. According to a given details in Parliament from 2009 so far the CBI 47 IRSIAS and IPS officers, corruption cases against seven.

Tested against the CBI officers except for staff is up to the Government. the Supreme Court, in four vacancies on the CBI reveal 2012. He within the stipulated time to dispose of government corruption case and seriously questioning. He asked when the Government corruption case are going to fill the vacancies in the CBI dysfunction is why now ? Vacant senior positions in the CBI why is 50 percent while cases due to the lack to be affected?

The Court clearly stated that we would like to know the Government's intention of corruption in how many years will be disposed of? The Executive authority of such installations and court decisions generally stayed in the Executive? But the Government we want to know exactly what her interest in settling the corruption cases from the intensity? If the Government is not serious it should tell?

In this case, the Government filed by the Home Secretary on behalf of affidavit affidavit also described the vague expressions. He said that the Home Secretary's affidavit, is kind of very informal. it looks like he couldn't understand the seriousness of the case.

The CBI is the constitutional body. it is a branch of Government and is his advice and instructions from what even more disappointing tied some criticisms that the CBI has to listen to all the while the problem somewhere in the Government.